Whether the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 20th of April is to be understood as an order to Mr. Meade for deprecating, in his letter of the 23rd of April, the intemperance of the Executive Council with his conduct of the case, but I consider how wrong it was that he committed a grave error of judgement in reading an extract from the Opinion of the Acting Attorney General.
DRAFT.
Mr. Wingfield.
Mr. Bramston.
Mr. Meade.
Sir R. Herbert.
Lord Onslow.
Sir H. T. Holland.
The extract from which had been communicated to him in the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 20th of April, and also in the course of his case, reading in Council, is the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 23rd of February and the disapproval of his conduct in that respect, which was conveyed in the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 30th of April, was in my opinion deserved.
I consider that the Acting Attorney General was fully justified by the language used by M. Wodehouse in announcing his decision to adjourn the Extradition case, in assuming in his report of the 26th of April that M. Wodehouse's...
a
Whether the colonial foratory's
letter of the 20th
・g the 20% of
of April
to be understood as an
Nor
was
order
ner for deprecating, in his
letter of the 23rd
of April,
the Executive
the intemperance of the
with his conduct of the case, but the
I sarider howwon that he
Aank
committed a
grave
error
judgement in reading Cant an extract from the Opinion of the actin
of
attorney general,
acting
DRAFT,
Mr.
Mr.
judgement on the extradition®
extract from
MINUTE.
The
Mr. Wingfield.
Mr. Bramston.
Mr. Meade.
Sir R. Herbert.
Lord Onslow.
in
Sir H. T. Holland.
which had
been communicated to him
in the colonial Secretary's the 20th
letter of
And also in
count
&of April,
reading
in
Coul, is the course of his
case.
an
the
Colonial Senatory's letter of the
232d
23th of February and the
therepky
disaffiroval of this conduct
in that respect, which was
respect.
conveyed in the colonial
Secretary's
letter of the 301
38 tt
my opinion
of April, was in
deserved.
.6.. I consider that the acting
Horney general was fully Justified by the language used by M. Wodehouse in anmomacing his decision to adjourn the Extradition case,
in assumin
ssuming
in his report of the 26th
April
7
it that M- Wodehouse's
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.